The Russian proposal over Iran’s uranium enrichment program is considerable, but it has some problems and ambiguities to be clarified in future talks.

Reporting Iran’s dossier to the UN Security Council will be unconstructive and the end of diplomacy.

A moratorium is necessary when there is something dangerous. But all our activities are transparent.

Iran will continue activity aimed at mastering peaceful nuclear technologies under the supervision of IAEA specialists and will convince the Agency that this activity is peaceful and transparent.

Iran will continue to cooperate with the agency, even though its report launched some criticisms on us which have no legitimate or technical bases.

Iran will however, only consider the technical and legal aspects of the report and pay no attention at all to the political parts.

Iran has prepared itself ... they will get a crushing response if they make such a mistake.

Iran has the absolute right to enrich. Meanwhile, the other side has proposed that for a while the issue of enrichment could be resolved in a different way. This is worth discussing. I think we can reach an agreement that could suit today's circumstances.

Inside Iran, too, the public opinion and the elite saw many serious faults with these talks. On what basis or logic have Iran's nuclear talks been limited to, and conditional upon, the three European governments?

If you use the language of force, Iran will have no choice but to ... leave the framework of the NPT ... and to resume enrichment.